Independent minds. Dependent on coffee.No gurus. Just grievances.Correspondence, eventually
The case study has edited out everyone who made the project possible

The case study has edited out everyone who made the project possible

One person appears to have researched, designed, built and personally invented the internet.

The fictional case study begins with a modest “I.” By the third paragraph, an entire team has disappeared into its gravitational field.

Clear credit does not weaken your contribution. It helps someone understand what you actually did. Name your role and explain the decisions you were responsible for, alongside the work other people contributed.

Distinguish the project outcome from your individual part in it. If you do not have evidence for a result, leave the number out. A polished chart does not make an estimate become a finding.

Check which details you are allowed to share. A public launch does not necessarily make every internal document suitable for your portfolio, and a collaborator may want their role described accurately.

A useful case study can discuss constraints and unresolved questions. Those details often reveal more judgment than a story in which every choice was obviously correct.

You can be proud of your work without claiming to have personally operated every department. The developer remembers being there.

About this dispatch

Original satire and opinion from The Revision Cult. Invented office scenes illustrate familiar creative-work dilemmas; they are not accounts of named clients.

Continue readingMore in Creative survival
A rusty letter tray overflowing with stained envelopes and marked-up papers on a worn desk
Where’s your head at?
Search the collective grievance