
Your quick tweak has developed a central nervous system.
It has opinions. It has dependents. It would like to circle back on the original scope.
Revision hellThe machine made 200 options. Congratulations. You now have 200 decisions.
You generated 200 images. The room is impressed. Nobody knows which one belongs to the brand, but the volume is certainly happening.
Generating options and choosing a direction are different jobs. One can happen quickly. The other needs a point of view.
What should the audience understand? Which visual decisions belong to this brand? Where will the image appear? What would make an output wrong, even if it looks impressive?
Use those answers to reject images. An attractive picture that communicates the wrong idea is still the wrong picture, now with excellent lighting.
1 of 3
What should the audience understand?
Notes from the creative departmentWhat can we afford to leave out?
Notes from the creative departmentWhat makes this one work?
Notes from the creative departmentReview composition, consistency, factual details, production requirements, and rights for the intended use. Check the image at its actual display size.
The useful skill is knowing why one option works and the others do not. That responsibility has not been automated just because the machine has become very enthusiastic about chrome.