Our AI policy is a shrug wearing a lanyard
The studio has approved experimentation. Nobody has defined the experiment.
Office politics
The brainstorm has elected the loudest person
The best idea could not get a word in, so it has gone back to its desk.
An imaginary team is generating ideas at speed. One person supplies most of the speed and all of the volume. The meeting notes describe this as collective enthusiasm.
A quick discussion can produce energy, but it is a poor test of who has thought most carefully. Give people the question before the session and a few quiet minutes to write independently.
Separate gathering possibilities from choosing them. If every unfinished suggestion receives an immediate verdict, people may stop sharing anything that needs explanation.
When you compare ideas, use the brief rather than the confidence of the person presenting. Ask quieter contributors whether they want to add context; do not turn participation into another performance they have to endure.
Record promising options that need development, then assign a next step. An idea should not vanish because its author failed to deliver a memorable hand gesture.
The loud person may still have an excellent suggestion. It will survive being evaluated at a normal speaking volume.
Your revision is next. Keep rolling
See all dispatches
Collaboration: a group project with better chairs
Shared ownership works better when somebody knows who is sending the file.
Office politics
Our agency is now a collective of people who share a spreadsheet
New structure. Same urgent question about who owns the client call.
Office politics